Wellbeing Nutrition sells to people who read labels before they read ads. We rebuilt the Meta creative around that, starting with the buyers already closest to purchase and carrying what won back up the funnel.
Wellbeing Nutrition is a D2C nutrition brand built around time-release delivery rather than bigger doses.
Three products carried the spend here. Slow Triple Magnesium Complex, three magnesium forms released across eight hours. Slow Triple Strength Omega-3, a triglyceride form fish oil. And Kids Superfuel, a children's drink mix sweetened with fruit instead of sugar.
The buyer is not a beginner. They compare bisglycinate against citrate. They know what EPA and DHA stand for. They turn the pack around before they add to cart. That one fact is what the whole creative programme was built on.
The audience buying the product had left that stage a long time ago. Ads opened on mood and closed on a discount, and the mechanism that justifies the price sat in the small print or nowhere at all.
A shopper who had viewed a product page three times got the same ad as someone who had never heard of the brand.
Three forms of magnesium, eight hour release, triglyceride absorption. All of it real, none of it on the creative.
Without enough variants in market there was nothing to read, and the pipeline could not produce them fast enough.
Supplements sit close to a line. Copy kept drifting into territory Meta rejects and ASCI acts on, which cost days in rework.
Most creative programmes start with reach and hope intent turns up later. We inverted it. Win with the people already close to buying, find out what moves them, then take that upward into colder audiences.
The first wave went in front of retargeting and high-intent audiences on Meta only. Small audiences, fast reads, and no budget spent on people still deciding whether they care about magnesium at all.
For this buyer the differentiator is how the product works. Three magnesium forms released over eight hours. Omega-3 in the form fish actually make. Sweetness from fruit instead of sugar. Every bottom of funnel creative leads with one of those and nothing else.
Each product ran in pairs. One creative answered the objection, one carried the evidence. Same product, same placement, same week, so the read stays clean and the pair teaches us something whichever way it lands.
The question version opens the loop and does the prospecting. The statement version answers it and does the retargeting. One idea, two jobs, run in sequence rather than against each other.
No disease claims. No addressing the reader's body. No before and after, and never a child shown as a result. Kids creative speaks to the parent. Every claim traces back to something already cleared. Writing inside the rules is faster than redrawing a rejected ad.
Every creative ran as a static on Meta at 4:5, sized for the feed. Within each product one creative asks the question, one makes the statement and one carries the proof.
The eight hour release is the reason to switch, so every creative here is built on it rather than on how tired anyone feels.
View full size →
The retargeting workhorse. It names the hour the category quietly fails at and puts the mechanism beside it, 1000mg across three forms released over eight hours. Pack and capsule shot as evidence rather than as a product photo.
View full size →
The prospecting half of the pair. It borrows an interface everyone already understands and lets the reader answer the question themselves. The question interrogates the concept, never the reader's body.
View full size →
Built on the three cleared trial figures. The claim strip does the selling, so the headline only has to reframe sleep as something the body is working through. That is what makes an eight hour supply matter.
Absorption is the whole argument here. Triglyceride form first, and the numbers that follow from it second.
View full size →
A number the reader has never counted, attached to the organ they care most about. The absorption line and the EPA and DHA split carry the reason to move off a cheaper fish oil.
View full size →
Aimed straight at the objection of the informed buyer, who is usually already taking something. A single capsule held up close, with the mechanism and the dose stacked beside it.
View full size →
Four cleared figures on one frame, with the capsule rendered large enough to read as the subject. It closes people who have already accepted the argument and now want the evidence.
Written for the parent and never for the child. Sugar is the objection every time, so we answered it in the headline rather than in the small print.
View full size →
The two jobs a children's product has to do at once, said in one line. Real fruit sweetness and the protein per scoop sit as callouts, so the parent gets the detail without the headline having to carry it.
View full size →
The single biggest reason a parent puts the pack back down. Answering it directly, with the flavour and the nutrient count right there, turned it from a reason to leave into a reason to buy.
View full size →
Three benefits and no promises about height or performance. A child shown playing rather than shown as a result, which is both the compliant read and the more believable one.
Winning against high intent first meant the cheaper purchases were paying for the reach long before prospecting had to justify itself.
| Click-through rate | 0.91% to 2.24% on the bottom of funnel set |
|---|---|
| Return on ad spend | 1.9X to 3.2X on high-intent audiences |
| Cost per purchase | Down 41% across Magnesium, Omega-3 and Kids Superfuel |
| Add to cart rate | Up 63% from the same traffic |
| Revenue from Meta | 2.7X over the quarter |
| Creative throughput | Enough variants in market each month to keep three products in continuous test |
Net effect: cheaper purchases at the bottom paid for the reach at the top, and the mechanism lines that won on retargeting became the prospecting hooks.
What the brand has now is a repeatable way to build creative rather than a folder of finished files. Every product gets the same treatment. Find the mechanism, write the objection against the proof, ask it as a question for cold traffic and answer it as a statement for warm.
Claims are checked before the brief is written rather than after the ad is rejected, which is what lets the pipeline run at pace without the legal drag.
Because it starts with the buyers closest to purchase, the programme pays for itself before it is asked to scale. The winners earn their way up the funnel instead of being guessed at from the top.
Tell us what you sell and who is closest to buying it. We will show you where the creative is leaking.
Start a conversationOther D2C, wellness and FMCG brands we have built for.
ASK THE BEE · LIVE
LIVE · AI ASSISTANT
